"You Slay Me" Spork: Chapter 3
When we last left Aisling she just got arrested by the French police, when they caught her with a bloody murder weapon in her hands. This should be fun! I can’t wait to read what happens next! So what do they do? Do they beat the shit out of her in the interrogation room? A little waterboarding, maybe?
“Hi. I’m Aisling Grey, in room twenty-three. Are there any messages for me?”
The hotel clerk on graveyard duty looked up from his magazine and gave me a martyred sigh before reluctantly setting down his Paris Match and hoisting his bulk out of the chair. “It will require me to check,” he said, his voice rich with accusation.
What? Where is the police violence? Don’t tell me they just let her go.
Yes, they did. She is now back at the hotel. It is six in the morning and the hotel clerk can apparently see what kind of person she really is because he immediately dislikes her. There is a message for her and he gives the paper to her, but the whole time he acts like it was the most bothersome thing anyone ever asked him to do. Aisling, being the saint she is, bears with his rudeness, despite the fact she had absolutely no sleep in over thirty hours and has just returned from being questioned.
The note is from her uncle Damian who demands that she checked in with him to report on how the delivery went. Aisling crumples the note and heads for the elevator which doesn’t work, which means she would have to climb five flights of stairs to get to her room. Poor Aisling! The torture she endures! She truly is more than a mere human, bearing with all these inconveniences!
In her room, she discovers her bags were stolen, which totally ruins her day and since the dress she is wearing is unwearable because of all the blood stains (“Does all this innocent blood make my butt look big?“) which means she would have to go shopping. She washes the dress as best as she can and heads downstairs to complain to the manager that her bag was stolen. The manager, too, is very hostile, and says that Aisling probably just left the door open and therefore she is not liable. Heh. I love this hotel. It’s is as if every single part of it had something against Aisling. I can relate.
Aisling then orders some breakfast and the manager reluctantly agrees to send her some in the dining hall, that looks out to a “petite little garden“, which sounds horribly pretentious.
Over her breakfast, Aisling thinks about the interrogation, which ushers us into her flashback.
She is interrogated by inspector Proust (huh?) who does not seem to believe a single word she says and informs her that Interpol does not have detectives, since it’s an organization centered around sharing information concerning various international investigations. She is mostly mad at Drake because it’s all his fault. But then they let her go, even though it seems that there is a considerable amount of evidence against Aisling. Why do they let her go, you ask?
“You say you had nothing to do with Mme. Deauxville’s death, so I have no grounds to charge you.“
They let her go because she, the suspect, says she has nothing to do with the murder. Why of course! Because if she were guilty, surely she would have confessed immediately! No criminal ever lies to the police because lying is wrong, children.
headdesk
Ouch.
Aisling then blabbers for a change:
I smiled at the question in his soft brown eyes. “I didn’t kill her, honest. I don’t know who did, unless Drake murdered her, and he says he didn’t, but then, he lied to me about being an Interpol agent, and he stole my dragon, so how much of what he said can I really believe? Besides, he’s too handsome. I don’t trust handsome men like that. They think they’re god’s gift to women, and they go around grabbing you and kissing you and smelling really nice, and making your legs turn to mush when you’re pulled up tight against them, not to mention filling your head with all sorts of really wicked thoughts about what you’d like to do to them with a small bowl of ice cream and your tongue. Well, not your tongue, my tongue. And speaking of that, just how did he know the aquamanile was gold?”
I put her word vomits here because they have to be seen to be believed. She acts like those obnoxious heroines of your insufferable generic romantic comedy when the writer is trying to make them seem lovably scatterbrained. Oh, never mind.
No ratty damp jail cell for me, woo-hoo!“
When you get arrested on suspicion of murder, the comfort of your cell should always be the biggest of your worries. Also, all cells in Paris are damp and have rats in them, mostly due to the fact that the prisoners have to sleep on bundles of hay. Since, you know, we are in France.
Please, somebody make the stupid stop.
She asks the inspector to let her know when they find Drake and her dragon (which suddenly stops being an “aquamanile“) and he says yes. Then we cut back to Aisling staring and talking into her coffee as she realizes the inspector did not believe her.
Since the police took her passport upon arrest, which I think, although am not quite sure, is pretty illegal here in Europe, she has no other option but to stay put. But she is not going to do that with blood stains all over her dress. She decides to go shopping and calls Rene, the cab driver from Chapter One.
Because Rene is supposed to be a likable character, he is terribly concerned about what happened to Aisling and demands that she told him. Aisling is low on money so she cashes in her plane ticket and then it’s SHOPPING TIME!
Rene drives her to a place that belongs to the wife of his cousin or some other relative, I don’t care, because that way Aisling will get a discount. But no! There are two outfits she likes! The cutest cream – colored tunic that goes with a matching pair of pants and a slinky black dress with red poppies on it, which will certainly turn quite a few heads. But with her tight financial situation, she cannot afford both! However is she going to solve this brain – wrecking dilemma? The tension is killing me!
Aisling does not let the reader down and uses her sharp intellect. She figures that hey, it’s authentic French fashion! From Paris, nonetheless! So if she eats less, she can get both fabulous outfits! Yay!
headdesk
headdesk
headdesk
Whoa… I think I can see music now… faints
wakes up and rubs eyes
What happened?
looks at screen
AAAAAAAAAARGH!!!!!
reaches for a bottle of vodka and downs half of it
There, that’s much better.
hiccups
No, that wasn’t me.
Aisling pays up and in the taxi, she and Rene agree that if she were to clear her name, she should find whoever drew the circle, since the person who did it is undoubtedly the killer. She does not think Drake was the one doing all the murdering because he did not look like a murderer.
sigh
Investigation 101 – Murders: There is no profile for a murderer. Anybody can kill anybody else. Men, women, young, old, well – off or not so well,– off ugly or attractive – anybody can have a motive to murder somebody and anybody can do it, regardless of who you are or what you do. Murder is the only true equal – opportunity employer and this is where the basic and, might I add, very correct mindset of a homicide detective “everybody is a suspect“ comes from. This is also why the rate of solved murders is so high – the percentage is generally in high 80s – lower 90s. Murder really doesn’t pay, if you think about it.
Rene soon turns into an idiot as well because he admits that Drake really doesn’t sound like a killer. Rene is officially uncool from here on. If only the modern police realized the potential of using subjective impressions in their investigations. Aisling then talks about the circle drawn on the carpet and we are treated to yet another excourse into her knowledge of demonology. Her explaining these things to random people is not only bad exposition, it’s also a painfully horrible excuse for an exposition. He is just a cab driver! Why do you tell him such things!
“It’s my hobby. I study medieval demon texts.“
At this point, he should just toss her out of the car, 50 euros or not. I know I am bitching about it a lot, but this “reading ancient demonology texts“ excuse for not only exposition, but a lot of random knowledge Aisling has I find simply jarring. Although still not as bad as “I saw it on Detection Channel“.
Anyways. Since the circle seems to be the only lead Aisling has, she figures she could visit some book shops that deal to people interested in the occult and ask around. How is she going to go about it is beyond me. Is she going to go around asking everybody “Oh, hello, didn’t you sell a book on demon summoning to this guy, he was probably dressed all in black, laughed maniacally at everything and had a bloody knife on his person? He could also mention something about offering the immortal soul of a certain rich lady to the lord of darkness?“
This is also why my sporks have been so long so far – everything about this book is simply retarded.
Oh and Rene of course knows where all the occult stores are in Paris. Have you ever been to Paris, author? Do you have any idea how gigantic it is? As somebody who lives in a large city, albeit not even half as big, I can tell you that I know people who, throughout their whole lives, almost never set foot out of the district they live and work in. If I asked a cab driver something like that he would tell me he is not a fucking tour guide and that I should look into a fucking map or do an internet search.
Sorry, rant over.
So after teaching her another handy phrase used exclusively to insult people around her, Aisling goes to visit a bunch of occult bookstores, all of which are “dark, murky occult bookshops, shops that seemed to thrive on dirt and the merest hint of sunlight through grimy, unwashed windows“. Not only does MacAlister use ever cliché in the book, she also WROTE the bloody book.
She finds one that is shockingly light and has some pots with some pretty flowers on the windowsills under the windows which are – gasp! – washed clean. The shopkeeper is a woman with eyes “pale, pale blue, the kind of blue you see on Siberian huskies.“ Since Aisling never bothered to learn any phrases that do not involve ridiculous insults, she asks the woman whether she speaks English and of course she does and not only that, she is absolutely delighted at Aisling’s visit.
The shopkeeper’s name is Amelie and she has an old Corgi which is a living proof that dogs have a strange sixth sense about people, since the dog dislikes Aisling immediately and even snaps at her hand. This startles Aisling so much, she drops the shopping bag, spilling out the contents, one of which is her blood – stained dress. Amelie snorts at what a bother dragon scales are, getting everywhere, and thus she informs Aisling that she had to be with a dragon recently, since her dress is covered in them. To Aisling they look like slight iridiscent powder – ewwww. Anybody else thought of seeing all sorts of bodily fluids under a black light? Coupled with “You must have been with a dragon recently,” the whole thing sounds very, very wrong.
Aisling asks if Amelie means the huge, firebreathing, flying reptilian monster kind of dragon, which amuses Amelie, because if dragons walked around in their “animal form“ people would stuff them in laboratories and turn them into needle pillows soon after.
Amelie then asks what sept the dragon is from and where is Aisling’s portal, since she is a Guardian. Aisling plays dumb on the Guardian thing but mentions Drake’s name which causes Amelie to shit bricks since it turns out that not only is Drake a dragon, but he is also the wyvern of all green dragons.
“Wait,” I said, shaking my head and gripping the counter so I wouldn’t fall over. “Isn’t a wyvern another name for a two-legged dragon? One with wings and a barbed tail?”
Aren’t Horde flying mounts in WoW called “wyverns“ as well?
“Yes,” she said slowly, her blue eyes growing darker. “It is also the name for the leader of a dragon sept. His name explains that.”
I rubbed my forehead. “You’ve lost me.”
Yeah, me too.
“Drake—a modernization of the Latin draco, meaning ‘dragon.’ Vireo is also Latin. It means ‘green.’ Only wyverns are allowed to use their sept color as a name.”
Okay. Here I had to take a moment to rummage through some of my books (since I am writing this at home, offline), since I am in no way learned in the matter of dragons. I hoped to gain some clarification, and I don’t know if I am any clearer on the subject but this is what I have come up with:
Natural history and legends do not equate wyverns with dragons. In Dragons: a natural history, Dr. Shuker lists them among semi – dragons and therefore not “true“ dragons as such. They are much smaller and less threatening, although they can make quite a mess of things as well. They have two legs, two wings, basically four limbs, like, let’s say, a pterodactyl or a bat. D&D Draconomicon lists them as relatives to drakes, who are very distant relatives of true dragons, but again, not real dragons. Draconomicon actually says something along the lines that wyverns and drakes are more closely related to each other than to true dragons. Which also brings out the problem of trying to find defining lore concerning a creature that is a character in so many mythologies, older and newer alike, and that none of what is said about dragons, can be said for sure.
And “drake“ is also a male duck for some reason. snigger I think I like this one best.
One conclusion I did arrive to, however is that wyvern equal dragon does not.
Moving on.
Aisling takes the whole Drake being a dragon thing her own way:
“Can we go back to the part about Drake being a mythical creature who breaths fire and consumes virgins and all that? Because I just can’t seem to wrap my brain around that idea. He was … He was so masculine. Gorgeous. Sexy as hell.”
If somebody wants to punch her, you have my whole – hearted support.
Amelie says that immortals need not wear human suits, they merely change shape. She then adds, with “eyes dreamily closed“ and while stroking Aisling’s hair:
“You are untouched by the dark powers, and yet you were born to harness them. You are a wyvern’s mate, and yet he did not claim you. You are a puzzle that has no end and no beginning.”
Yawn.
Okay, so Aisling is Special ™ and it’s her Destiny ™ to be with Drake which is both unsurprising and stupid. And this is the second time she’s been called a puzzle. Gee, I wonder why is that?
“Whoa,” I said, my muscles all stiffening at the words “wyvern’s mate.” “Let’s just take a step back from that idea, shall we?”
“Because the very idea of me having a boy/girl thing for him is ridiculous. I have no feelings towards the absurdly powerful man who manhadled me so roughly, it was basically abuse, whatsoever. No. And the more I repeat it, the more obvious my utter lack of sexual interest in him is, even if I am on the verge of orgasming every time his name is even mentioned“.
Aisling then asks whether Amelie knows where to find Drake and she tells her about this bar called G&T which translates into „Goethy and Theurgy“, ergo “black and white magic“. Subtle. Amelie also does not find the fact that Drake robbed Aisling the least bit odd, since, as she says with a mischievous grin, “dragons hoard treasure“ and green dragons are especially good thieves. I am sure Victor would have a word or two to say about the whole hoarding thing.
As Aisling leaves, Amelie tells her to keep her mind open to possibilities, since she would hate to miss Aisling’s entrance to something called “Otherworld“. Asling leaves without saying anything, since there is nothing left to say.
I agree with that and I bid you adieu for now.
Tagged as Aisling Gray, Falconempress, Paranormal Romance, Spork.Comment
By Danielle
on Apr 8, 11:58 AM
“You are untouched by the dark powers, and yet you were born to harness them. You are a wyvern’s mate, and yet he did not claim you. You are a puzzle that has no end and no beginning.”
….
Someone interesting had better step in and step in fast before the vultures descend and feast upon all those who have died of boredom.

Ah, Joker, you never disappoint. Now, just take one of your kill buzzer thingys over to Aisling and shake her hand, while I call Drake and tell him dinner’s ready!
By Silivren
on Apr 8, 12:32 PM
phew Thanks Danielle. The Joker was greatly appreciated :)
It simply astonishes me that an editor would allow this off their desk. After the reading the first chapter they should’ve just thrown it in the trash with a big ‘Un-salvageable’ stamp on it. This and Twilight.
shudder What is the world coming to?
By dragonarya
on Apr 8, 03:02 PM
She acts like those obnoxious heroines of your insufferable generic romantic comedy when the writer is trying to make them seem lovably scatterbrained.
Maybe she is.
There, that’s much better.
hiccups
hands Falconempress a large bottle of bleeprin
Hope that helps.
I’m a bit of a dragon expert (love mythical creatures) so let me see… Most dragons, at least the traditional European fire-breathers have barbed tails, so that’s wrong… I don’t know about wyverns being smaller and less threatening, since from what I’ve read they live in Africa and eat elephants… But yeah, wyverns and dragons do have several fundamental differences.
As for drakes, I don’t think I’ve seen it used to refer to another subspecies of dragon, but just as another word for dragon, like wyrm.
(Hope I’m not coming across as a know-it-all)
By Snow White Queen
on Apr 8, 06:03 PM
Holy crap, it just gets worse and worse! I feel for you, falconempress.
By Apep
on Apr 8, 07:28 PM
@dragonarya
Are you sure you’re not confusing wyverns with rocs as far as eating elephants goes? Not that you’re wrong about anything else, mind. Stupid authors not doing research…
By hmyd.windmere
on Apr 8, 09:25 PM
“Petite little garden?” Isn’t that sort of like saying the “gris gray elephant?” With extra pretentiousness stirred in, of course.
By Charlotte
on Apr 8, 09:34 PM
This book makes me sad, but it’s an excellent spork, at least.
And FAIL on the part of the French police.
By LucyWannabe
on Apr 9, 12:19 AM
If somebody wants to punch her, you have my whole – hearted support.
punches Aisling
:D
By dragonarya
on Apr 9, 09:15 AM
Are you sure you’re not confusing wyverns with rocs as far as eating elephants goes?
Um, I think they both eat elephants, since size-wise they’d be pretty close. At least from what I’ve read…
By Snow White Queen
on Apr 9, 01:32 PM
It’s also funny how a random woman immediately knows that Aisling is some random dragon’s mate. Chosen One much?
By Nate Winchester
on Apr 9, 05:41 PM
What? Where is the police violence? Don’t tell me they just let her go.
And they wonder where the “French are pansies” stereotype comes from…
“Does all this innocent blood make my butt look big?“
I can just see the sexiest, most awesome villainess ever asking that.
I put her word vomits here because they have to be seen to be believed. She acts like those obnoxious heroines of your insufferable generic romantic comedy when the writer is trying to make them seem lovably scatterbrained. Oh, never mind.
Some people just need to be slapped.
Aisling does not let the reader down and uses her sharp intellect. She figures that hey, it’s authentic French fashion! From Paris, nonetheless! So if she eats less, she can get both fabulous outfits! Yay!
Wait… umm… she doesn’t have a plane ticket any more. So doesn’t she now have to stay in France indefinitely? How is she going to cut down on eating forever?
Anybody can kill anybody else. Men, women, young, old, well – off or not so well,– off ugly or attractive – anybody can have a motive to murder somebody and anybody can do it, regardless of who you are or what you do.
Ah yes, I remember the case of the 10 day old killer… or that guy in the coma who went on a killing spree…
Yeah, I know you meant anyone capable of it but the imagery makes me laugh. (especially of a toddler trying to kill like… Shaq without any tools or aid)
Aisling asks if Amelie means the huge, firebreathing, flying reptilian monster kind of dragon, which amuses Amelie, because if dragons walked around in their “animal form“ people would stuff them in laboratories and turn them into needle pillows soon after.
I think that depends on the dragon. A certain someone from Nagasaki Moon would dare the world to put him/her in a laboratory… ;-)
In Dragons: a natural history, Dr. Shuker lists them among semi – dragons and therefore not “true“ dragons as such.
Hmmm…. a book I don’t have (yet). I owe you one for bringing this to my attention.
If somebody wants to punch her, you have my whole – hearted support.
Can do!
You are a puzzle that has no end and no beginning.
I’m pretty sure she has an end and beginning. They are usually referred to as “date of birth” and “date of death”.
And the more I repeat it, the more obvious my utter lack of sexual interest in him is, even if I am on the verge of orgasming every time his name is even mentioned.
This strikes me as the chief reasoning behind pointing out these paranormal romances as “girl porn”. Seriously, do any of these give the woman motivation for desiring the man beyond the guy is fucking hot? (pun intended) How’s that different from actual porn? The hot co-ed is never wanted for anything beyond her hot ass (or so I’ve heard). Quite frankly, all this just depresses me.
By falconempress
on Apr 10, 01:20 AM
tosses the bleeprin in
Thats much better, thank you:)
It’s also funny how a random woman immediately knows that Aisling is some random dragon’s mate. Chosen One much?
Noooo. Surely you just. There is nothing, nothing in the entire book that would so much as suggest such an eventuality. Seriously, what is wrong with you? :P
@dragonarya – yay, the dragon expert is here to point out all the fail in the spork! And MacAlisters work as well :P
Thank you so much for the info and setting things straight. The wyverns could really get that big? Whoa. Eating an entire elephant is pretty badass.
@Nate –
I can just see the sexiest, most awesome villainess ever asking that.
She should totally show up an kill Aislings sorry ass.
Wait… umm… she doesn’t have a plane ticket any more. So doesn’t she now have to stay in France indefinitely? How is she going to cut down on eating forever?
Or she just figures she will find herself a hunky, rich beefcake of a MAN that would buy it for her. Because shes oh so charming. Thanks for pointing out another whole layer of stupid. If this were a real world, she would soon be homeless, starving and sleeping under bridges.
But she will look totally chic while doing all these things.
I hate this book so much.
I think that depends on the dragon. A certain someone from Nagasaki Moon would dare the world to put him/her in a laboratory… ;-)
You keep bringing up Nagasaki Moon in your shameless plugging fashion. Can you email me a copy then, please?
Thank you guys for being so awesome. And for even reading this, huh. Helps me live to spork another day :D
By falconempress
on Apr 10, 01:29 AM
Sorry, for the double posting, but forgot to add something.
This strikes me as the chief reasoning behind pointing out these paranormal romances as “girl porn”. Seriously, do any of these give the woman motivation for desiring the man beyond the guy is fucking hot? (pun intended) How’s that different from actual porn? The hot co-ed is never wanted for anything beyond her hot ass (or so I’ve heard). Quite frankly, all this just depresses me.
Compared to this, I have much more respect for regular porn. Because regular porn at least has the decency (wow, I just used “decency” in the same sentence with “porn”. See what this thing is doing to my brain?) to not hide what it actually is. This… this… thing parades itself around as a perfectly socially acceptable piece of literature pretending to be perfectly innocent, if a bit raunchy. Nobody would scowl at you if they caught you in the subway reading this (well, as long as that person wasnt me). But if it were a porn magazine, everybody would be oh so justly enraged.
Not that I read porn in subways:P
I think I may have gone too far with this verbal construct and got myself caught in it:P
BUT YOU GET MY POINT
By dragonarya
on Apr 10, 08:59 PM
Thank you so much for the info and setting things straight.
No problem. :)
The wyverns could really get that big? Whoa. Eating an entire elephant is pretty badass.
Wyverns are the largest dragons, so only elephants would do for a good meal! XD
By Tolly
on Apr 13, 02:06 AM
eternal facepalm
How does this kind of bullshit keep getting past editors? I mean, seriously. It’s too poorly written to even be amusing in a ‘how did this get PUBLISHED?’ kind of way.
offers RETCON
By Thea
on Apr 13, 02:26 AM
I don’t know…that word vomiting at the police station might have convinced me of her, well, for lack of a better word, innocence.
After all, her behavior is entirely inappropriate (it almost sounds as though she’s flirting with the detective while orgasming over a man who practically assaulted her and then stole her stuff. Add in that she’s so obviously profoundly…dumb…maybe they just let her talk at them for five minutes because she couldn’t have hidden it for that long (such scatterbrained heroines are always so bad at lying, after all).
Then again, if they didn’t have any evidence that she didn’t do it :/ (just seems odd to me) then maybe they should have arrested her on principle of her being an idiot and why not.
Frankly I prefer not to think of it too much :P
By Lilan Jaku
on Apr 13, 03:35 AM
Sorry to break your bubbles folks, but dragons are NOT real. Therefore I find arguing about whether they eat elephants or not just a bit…well I think you know what I mean(A)…Personally I think there is just no way, even when you are a dragon expert, to know who is right or wrong because everyone just got it from some book. Every book says something else…so it’s just the matter of varying literature. continues to beat the shite out of that poor excuse for a main character called Ashring
By dragonarya
on Apr 13, 09:12 AM
@ Lilan Jaku: Well, not just “some book”, but what’s wrong with talking about dragons, even if they’re not real? What we’re talking about is whether the author did the research compared to our material, which she didn’t. It’s perfectly fine to use ideas that weren’t in folklore and books. It’s when you take it too far, like SMeyer’s sparklepires, that there’s trouble.
By falconempress
on Apr 13, 10:43 AM
sorry LJ, but I have to go with dragonarya on this one. Dragons may not be real, but there is a certain established mythology and within that mythology, certain terms carry certain connotations with them. If the writer does not do the research and goes for something of their own, sure, thats okay. As long as its not absurd. Like the aforementioned sparklepires (blergh) or, as the case may be, this book.
By Nate Winchester
on Apr 13, 02:58 PM
Sorry to break your bubbles folks, but dragons are NOT real.
Yeah, that’s what I thought.
By Lilan Jaku
on Apr 14, 07:51 AM
@dragonarya, FE…I get your point and I completely agree. I think nobody can even express in words how stupid this whole book is. but I meant something else by that:D
@Nate, I think you answered yourself pretty wel. when you look at the Latin, therefore generally accepted name, you will realise it’s a type of monitor, or giant lizard;)once you put dragon or wyvern in google, you will find out that they are LEGENDARY (i.e.mythological, from legends) creatures:P
By Nate Winchester
on Apr 14, 08:59 AM
LJ, it’s all in good fun. XD
Now stop dissing dragons before Gustave comes and murders you.

